Haldhar Tanti v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49322 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2025 Thana- RAJAON District- Banka ====================================================== Haldhar Tanti S/o- Late Sukhdeo Resident of Village- Rasalpur, P.S.- Rajoun, District- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sheonandan Pandit, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary APP For the Informant :

Dr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 25-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Rajoun P.S. Case No. 52 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the informant alleged his brother was killed by nine co-villagers due to his love affair with Parwati Kumari, who was forcibly married to him, and thereafter his body was thrown on the railway track. The accused are alleged to have restrained and murdered him before disposing of the body.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that general and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49322 of 2025(4) dt.25-09-2025 2/2 omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. No specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner. There is no eye-witness to the occurrence and the petitioner is being dragged in this case merely on the basis of suspicion. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 29.04.2025 and has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, there being no cogent material against the petitioner to show his involvement in the alleged occurrence as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Rajoun P.S. Case No. 52 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T