← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/448/2017disposed

Nilkanth Singh Rakesh v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna And ORS

2022-11-04Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

(FROM RESIDENTIAL OFFICE VIA VIDEO APPLICATION) Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.448 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District- ====================================================== Nilkanth Singh 'Rakesh' Son of Bindeshwari Singh R/o Vill - Mangarpal Nuran, P.O. - Tarwan Mangarpal, P.S. - Dariyapur, Dist. - Saran. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Patna.

4.

The Managing Director, Housing Board, Patna.

5.

The Office-in-Charge, Kankarbagh Police Station, Patna. 6.

Smt. Ranjana Singh W/o Nilkanth Singh 'Rakesh'. 7.

Vipul Singh S/o Nilkanth Singh 'Rakesh' All residents of Janta Flat 19/219, Lohiya Nagar, P.S. - Kankarbagh, Dist. - Patna. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Suman Kumar Jha, AC to AAG-3 For resp nos. 6 & 7 :

Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 04-11-2022 Perused the report of the S.H.O., Kankarbagh. It appears that the petitioner, his wife and son are not maintaining good relationship. It has transpired in course of preliminary inquiry that the petitioner has earlier neglected his wife and children and as per the allegations, he has sold some land in his village which are being opposed by his wife and son. In the nature of the disputes involved, this Court would not make any comment on the merit of the allegations but one thing is crystal clear that these are not the matters to be gone into in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.448 of 2017(4) dt.04-11-2022 2/2 Constitution of India.

The petitioner, if so advised, may seek his remedy before appropriate forum.

This writ application is dismissed accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) SUSHMA2/- U Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.