Subodh Singh @ Subodh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7726 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-399 Year-2020 Thana- MASHRAK District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

SUBODH SINGH @ SUBODH KUMAR SINGH SON OF MAHATAM SINGH Resident of Village - Arna, P.S.- Mashrakh, Distt.- Saran at Chhapra. 2.

PRINCE KUMAR SON OF MANBODH SINGH Resident of Village - Arna, P.S.- Mashrakh, Distt.- Saran at Chhapra. 3.

MANBODH KUMAR SINGH @ MANBODH SINGH SON OF MAHATAM SINGH Resident of Village - Arna, P.S.- Mashrakh, Distt.- Saran at Chhapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Yashraj Bardhan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madan Kumar, APP For the informant :

Mr. Anil Kr. Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-01-2022 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel for the informant, through Video Conferencing. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Mashrakh Police Station Case No. 399 of 2020, disclosing offences under Sections 341, 307, 323, 324, 354 (B), 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

At the very outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of anticipatory bail application of petitioner No.2.

Permitted to be withdrawn.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7726 of 2021(4) dt.18-01-2022 2/3 So far as petitioner Nos.1 and 3 are concerned, there is general and omnibus allegations of assault against them and the corresponding injuries have been found simple in nature.

The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the present case is outcome of an earlier dispute between the parties.

The learned counsel for the informant has vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner Nos. 1 and 3 and he has submitted that one person has suffered stab injury and other injured had sustained injury, though it may be simple but the offence cannot be mitigated because of this.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the application for anticipatory bail of petitioner Nos. 1 and 3 is allowed.

Let the petitioner No.1 and 3, named above, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within eight weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Saran at Chhapra, in connection with Mashrakh Police

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7726 of 2021(4) dt.18-01-2022 3/3 Station Case No. 399 of 2020, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sandeep Kumar, J) sanjeev/- U T