Shambhu Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49719 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-140 Year-2026 Thana- SAHAJITPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Shambhu Sah S/O Madhav Sah @ Madho Sah R/O Vill.- Dhobwal Bazar, P.s.- Baniyapur (Baiyanpur), Dist.- Saran At Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Anita Kumari, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-07-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 324(4), 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that while he was at his shop when accused persons came and petitioner assaulted him by an iron rod causing injury on his head and Sintu took away Rs.20,000/- from the cash box.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that petitioner and the informant have their shop adjacent to each other, as such, an

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49719 of 2026(2) dt.28-07-2026 2/2 altercation had taken place in which both sides assaulted each other. It is next submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then the blow is not alleged to have been repeated and the injury has been opined to be simple in nature which amply demonstrates that petitioner never had any intention of committing a serious offence.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Sahajitpur P.S. Case No. 140 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T