Ram Lal Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50859 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2022 Thana- UJIYARPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== RAM LAL MAHTO Son of late Rajendra Mahto R/V- Lohagir, P.s- Ujiarpur, Dist- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravi Shanker Pankaj, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Sharda Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 16-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 341, 323, 354(A), 307, 504, 507, 379/34 of the IPC.

Allegedly, the petitioner caught hold of hair of informant and thrashed her on ground and assaulted by fists and sticks brutally.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to grudge. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. It is submitted that there is a

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50859 of 2022(3) dt.16-01-2023 2/2 land dispute between the parties and injury of victims were found to be simple in nature, which is clear from the injury report annexed in the case diary. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Ujiarpur P.S. Case No.93 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T