Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10764/2015bail granted

Om Prakash Choudhary v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2016-04-27Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10764 of 2015 (13) dt.27-04-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10764 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -113 Year- 2014 Thana -PIYAR District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Om Prakash Choudhary son of Shri Ramchandra Choudhary resident of village + Post - Sirshi, P.S. - Nanpur, District - Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Priti Kumari wife of Shri Om Prakash Choudhary resident of village + Post - Sirshi, P.S. - Nanpur, District - Sitamarhi; at present daughter of Shri Chandeshwari Choudhary, at Madheya, P.S. - Pear, District - Muzaffarpur. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amrit Abhijat For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Prasad (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 27-04-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party No. 2.

After interacting with them, it appears that they are now ready to live with each other and a harmonious atmosphere has been created between them.

Considering the fact that the dispute has resolved, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest / surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Pear P.S. Case No. 113/2014,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10764 of 2015 (13) dt.27-04-2016 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C.

It is made clear that if at all there are any untoward incidence so as to prejudice the opposite party No. 2, in any manner, it shall be open to her to move this Court for modification / cancellation of the order.

(Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U T