← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50645/2025bail granted

Indrajeet Kumar @ Bhuwar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-30Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50645 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Indrajeet Kumar @ Bhuwar Son of Vidyarthi Manjhi Resident of VillageKhajauli PS -Derni, Dist- Saran 2.

Raushan Kumar son of Akhilesh Thakur Resident of Village-Khajauli PS -Derni, Dist- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Chetna, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Sadar Excise P.S. Case No. 112 of 2025 dated 01.06.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, total 103.680 litres of illicit foreign liquor was recovered from the Vikram Tempo.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The name of the petitioners was transpired in this case merely on suspicion. The petitioner no. 1

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50645 of 2025(2) dt.30-07-2025 2/2 is driver and the petitioner no. 2 is the passenger of the said vehicle but they have no knowledge about the aforesaid seized liquor. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioner no. 1 has one criminal antecedent whereas the petitioner no. 2 has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 02.06.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Saran at Chapra in connection with Sadar Excise P.S. Case No. 112 of 2025.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T