Ganga Sagar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16289 of 2019 ====================================================== 1.

Ganga Sagar Ram Son of Musafir Ram Resident of Village-Mominpur, P.S.- Karagahar, Distt.-Rohtas 2.

Saroj Kumar Son of Rajbali Ram Resident of Village-Debariyan, P.S.- Kochas, Distt.-Rohtas 3.

Surendra Tiwary Son of Ayodhya Tiwary Resident of Village-Deorai, P.S.- Chenari, Distt.-Rohtas 4.

Ramesh Kumar Chaudhary Son of Raghuvansh Choudhary Resident of Village-Laxmanpur, P.S. Distt.-Rohtas 5.

Santosh Ojha Son of Bashisth Ojha Resident of Village-Mohania, P.S.- Sheosagar, Distt.-Rohtas 6.

Mahendra Prasad Son of Shankar Ram Resident of Village-Akhtiarpur, P.S. Karagahar, Distt.-Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayati Raj, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary Department of Panchayati Raj, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Director Panchayati Raj, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4.

Bihar Staff Selection Commission Patna through its Secretary 5.

The Chairman Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna 6.

The Secretary Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dineshwar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kumar Alok (SC-7) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-08-2019 Mr. Dineshwar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners, after some arguments, seeks permission to withdraw this petition in order to enable the petitioners to approach the authorities for the redressal of their grievances.

Patna High Court CWJC No.16289 of 2019(2) dt.22-08-2019 2/2 If such an application is filed, the authorities shall consider the case of the petitioners in correct perspective and pass orders in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the fact that the present petition has not been entertained.

However, it is made clear in an unambiguous terms that the merits of the claim of the petitioners has not been adverted to by this Court.

With the aforesaid observation/direction, the petition is permitted to be withdrawn.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) Shageer/- U