Dinesh Kumar v. The Union Of India Through The Office Of Prime Minister Of India , New Delhi Through Its Joint Secr

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.297 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Dinesh Kumar son of Sri Parmeshwar Sahu, Resident of Village Kaithinya, P.S. Jhanjharpur (R.S.) District Madhubani, Presently residing at Kushum Niwas, Postal Park, Raod No.3, P.S. Jakkanpur, Town and District Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India Through The office of the Hon'ble Prime Minister of India , 7 Race Course Road, New Delhi- 110011 Through Its Joint Secretary.

2. The State of Bihar through Home Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.

5. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sadar, Kankarbagh, Patna.

6. The Station House Officer, Jakkanpur Police Station, District Patna.

7. The General Manager, Bank of India, Head Office: Star House, C-5, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai- 400051.

8. The Senior Manager, Bank of India, Noida, E-52, Sector 9, Noida201301, Uttar Pradesh, IFSC Code No BKID0007114. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arjun Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar(AAG-6) For the Union of India : Mr. S.D. Sanjay, ASG Mrs. Punam Kumari Singh, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 15-07-2016 Heard Mr. Arjun Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Anjani Kumar, learned Additional Advocate General No.6, appearing on behalf of the State-respondents. Heard also Mr. S.D. Sanjay, Additional Solicitor General, appearing on behalf of the Union of India.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to file complaint in the

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.297 of 2016 (2) dt.15-07-2016 2/2 Court of competent jurisdiction.

No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to file complaint in the Court of competent jurisdiction, in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. Mkr./- (I.A. Ansari, ACJ.) U T