Raj Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13334 of 2022 ====================================================== Raj Kumar Mandal son of Brijlal Mandal, Resident of Village -Ward No. 16, Hathapur P.S. Basopatti District- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Food Supply and Consumer Protection Department Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Collector, Madhubani.

3.

The Sub-Divisional Officer Jainagar, Madhubani. 4.

The District Supply Officer, Madhubani.

5.

The Block Supply Officer, Basopatti, Madhubani. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Adv.

Mr. Ravi Prakash, Adv.

Mr. Vinod Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Udeshya Kr. Yadav, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. S. Raza Ahmad (Aag5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 04-12-2023 Heard the learned counsels for the parties.

The present writ petition has been filed for the following relief(s):- "That this is an application for issuance of an appropriate writ(s) order(s), direction(s) for quashing the order dated 07.06.2022 passed in supply Appeal No. 145 of 2022 by the collector, Madhubani whereby and where under the Learned Collector was pleased to confirm the earlier ordered contained in memo no. 852 dated 13.08.2019 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer Jainagar

Patna High Court CWJC No.13334 of 2022(8) dt.04-12-2023 2/3 Madhubani by which the license of P.D.S.

shop dealer of petitioner has been cancelled and after quashing the abovesaid orders dated 07.06.2022 as well as 13.08.2019 respondents be directed to restore the license of P.D.S.

shop dealer of petitioner and to grant any other relief(s) for which petitioner may found entitled in accordance with law."

3. Without going into the merits or demerits of the case, having regard to the fact that the petitioner is having an alternative and efficacious remedy of filing a revision under Section 32(vi) of the Control Order 2016. The petitioner is directed to approach the Divisional Commissioner ventilating his grievance within a period of four weeks from the date of the receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the revision, the Divisional Commissioner shall pass necessary orders strictly in accordance with law within a period of four weeks thereof. It is needless to mention that before any order is passed, all the parties shall be put on notice and given an opportunity of hearing and submit their objections. The entire exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of eight weeks thereof. Any order passed shall be communicated to all the parties.

4. With the above said directions, the writ petition

Patna High Court CWJC No.13334 of 2022(8) dt.04-12-2023 3/3 stand disposed off.

(A. Abhishek Reddy , J) Gauravkr/- U