Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49575/2026bail granted

Ramjan Ansari @ Ramajan Ansari @ Ramjan v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-22Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49575 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-492 Year-2026 Thana- KISHANGANJ District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Ramjan Ansari @ Ramajan Ansari @ Ramjan Son of Majibul Ansari @ Matebul Ansari Resident of Village- Machhmara, Ward No. 33 Khagra, P.S.- Kishanganj, District- Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 492 of 2026, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 121(1), 121(1), 121(2), 122(1), 221, 324(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and later on Section 132 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 was added.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner along with other co-accused persons allegedly formed an unlawful assembly, attacked the police party to obstruct the arrest of an accused person, caused injuries to police personnel and damaging of the police vehicle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49575 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 2/2 present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner rather the same is general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been arrested only on the basis of suspicion. The petitioner is in custody since 09.05.2026 and has got no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 492 of 2026.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T