← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52557/2025bail granted

Kalamuddin Ali @ Kalamuddin Miyan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-11Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52557 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-237 Year-2025 Thana- KATEYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Kalamuddin Ali @ Kalamuddin Miyan S/O Daroga Ali R/O VillageGhanichakiya, PS- Kateya, Distt- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Suresh Prasad Bhakt, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 11-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 237 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 317(5), 111 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that police during vehicle checking apprehended co-accused with a stolen motorcycle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The name of the petitioner transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused Daroga Ali. No incriminating/looted article has been recovered from the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52557 of 2025(3) dt.11-11-2025 2/2 conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the motorcycle in question. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 04.05.2025 and has one criminal antecedent. The co-accused person has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 10.09.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 62651 of 2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, claim based on parity as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 237 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T