Patna High CourtCWJC/10874/2014withdrawn

Rang Vikalp And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-05-12Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.10874 of 2014 (9) dt.12-05-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10874 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Rang Vikalp, through its Secretary.

2. Sanyasi Red, son of Chandeshwar Prasad Singh, resident of village - Mahadeopur, P.S. Masaurhi, District - Patna at present residing at Studio Variation Artists Studio Sardar Patel Colony, Patlliputra Colony Telephone Exchange Road, behind SIS Security Office, Kurji, Patna 10, Bihar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Tourism Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Managing Director, Bihar State Tourism Development Department, Veer Chand Patel Path, Patna

4. The Chief Engineer, Bihar State Tourism Development Department, Veer Chand Patel Path, Patna

5. The Executive Engineer, Bihar State Tourism Development Department, Veer Chand Patel Path, Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. S.D. Sanjay, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Priya Gupta, Adv.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, Adv. Mr. Akash Chaturvedi, Adv.

Mr. Sudhanshu Trivedi, Adv.

Mr. Abhisekh Singh, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 12-05-2016 After some arguments, learned Senior counsel Mr. S.D. Sanjay, appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the forum of Arbitration for settlement of the dispute.

2. Learned counsel for the respondent State expresses that no objection would be raised on the issue of jurisdiction of the Arbitrator.

Patna High Court CWJC No.10874 of 2014 (9) dt.12-05-2016

3. Permission is accorded. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

4. It is made clear that this Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/- U