Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7314/2015rejected

Vijay Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2015-02-26Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7314 of 2015 (2) dt.26-02-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7314 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -287 Year- 2014 Thana -RIGA District- SITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Vijay Kumar Singh Son of Shri Balram Singh, R/o Village- Riga, Sheikhtola, P.S. - Riga, District - Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s Mr. G.S. Gupta (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 02/ 26.02.2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Riga P. S. case no. 287/2014 registered under section 307 and other allied sections of the IPC.

There is allegation against the petitioner that he put Gamcha around neck of the informant and pulled the same with an intent to commit his murder. Annexure 2 to this petition reveals that injury on the neck of the informant was found, though said injury is simple in nature.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that both parties have entered into compromise.

Considering the facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on anticipatory bail and accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7314 of 2015 (2) dt.26-02-2015 connection with the above stated case stands rejected. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi/ concerned court in the above stated case within four weeks from today and seeks regular bail, his regular bail application shall be disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by this rejection order, particularly, keeping in mind the factum of compromise.

shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J) U T