Pankaj Rai @ Pankaj Kumar Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61468 of 2021 In CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2419 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2020 Thana- DIGHWARA District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
PANKAJ RAI @ PANKAJ KUMAR RAI Son of Dahaur Rai Resident of Village - Saidpur Dighwara, P.S.- Dighwara, District - Chapra (Saran). 2.
Sunita Devi Wife of Pankaj Rai Resident of Village - Saidpur Dighwara, P.S.- Dighwara, District - Chapra (Saran).
3.
Chandan Rai Son of Ramadhar Rai Resident of Village - Saidpur Dighwara, P.S.- Dighwara, District - Chapra (Saran).
4.
Deepak Rai Son of Ramadhar Rai Resident of Village - Saidpur Dighwara, P.S.- Dighwara, District - Chapra (Saran).
5.
Naveen Rai Son of Moti Ray Resident of Village - Saidpur Dighwara, P.S.- Dighwara, District - Chapra (Saran).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Jitendra Narain Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Binay Krishna, Spl. PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 15-12-2021 Heard Mr. Jitendra Narain Sinha, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Binay Krishna, learned Spl. PP for the State.
Mr. Sinha, learned Advocate for the applicants/appellants seeks modification of the order dated 21.08.2021 passed in Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 2419 of 2021 to the extent that the name of the father of appellant no. 5 be read as Moti Ray.
The mistake has crept in the order because of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61468 of 2021(2) dt.15-12-2021 2/2 the wrong parentage of appellant no. 5 given in the memo of appeal.
In view of the statement made on behalf of the applicant/appellant no. 5, the order dated 21.08.2021 is modified to the extent that the name of the father of appellant no. 5 be read as 'Moti Ray'.
The order dated 21.08.2021 is modified to the extent indicated above.
In case the applicant/appellant no. 5 has not yet surrendered, the time for his surrendering is further extended by a period of six weeks with the other conditions in the order subsisting.
The petition stands disposed off accordingly. (Ashutosh Kumar, J) krishna/- U T