Naresh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49359 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2025 Thana- KHUSRUPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Naresh Singh Son of Late Ramphal Singh Resident of Village- Lodipur, Mansurpur, P.S.- Khushrupur, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Nibash Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 31-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Khushrupur P.S. Case No. 43 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1) & 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3.

The prosecution case is based on the fardbeyan of Uday Singh recorded on 27.01.2025 at NMCH, Patna. It is alleged that the informant's family was attacked at their home by FIR-named accused with deadly weapons, and his son Amol Kumar was shot by Gautam Kumar. Amol sustained a gunshot injury and died on the way to NMCH during treatment. 4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49359 of 2025(2) dt.31-07-2025 2/3 that the petitioner is in custody since 17-02-2025. Petitioner bears one criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner, rather allegation attributed to the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. It is evident from the FIR itself, that co-accused, namely, Gautam Kumar has fired. The only allegation against the petitioner is that he was member of the unlawful assembly. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has no role in the alleged offence and he is roped in this case due to earlier dispute.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and there being no specific allegation against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49359 of 2025(2) dt.31-07-2025 3/3 Court below/concerned Court in connection with Khushrupur P.S. Case No. 43 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T