Binod Kumar Advocate v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3348 of 2015 ====================================================== Binod Kumar Advocate S/o Late Ram Prasad Practising Advocate of the High Court, Patna Resident of Mohalla Bank Colony (Bigrahpur Road), Police Station Jakkanpur, District Patna-1.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Secretary, Bihar Intermediate Education Council, Bihar, Patna.

5. The D.I.G., Vigilance, Saran Pramandal, Saran at Chapra.

6. The District Magistrate, Saran, Chapra.

7. The S.P., Saran, Chapra.

8. Secretary, Mahanth Vijay Ramjee Das, Inter Evening College, Amnour, Police Station Amnour, District Saran.

9. Principal, Prof. S.P. Tiwari, M.V.R.D. Inter Evening College Amnour, P.S. Amnour, District Saran.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Dhananjay Mishra, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Partha Sarthy, G.A.-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 12-01-2016 Heard Mr. Dhananjay Mishra, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Parth Sarthy, learned Government Advocate No.11, appearing for the State respondents. After some arguments, Mr. Dhananjay Mishra, learned Counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this application, made, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, with liberty to

Patna High Court CWJC No.3348 of 2015 (2) dt.12-01-2016 2/2 approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

No objection has been raised by the respondents to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. However, we make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merit of the present writ petition. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Pawan/- U