Anuradha Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13176 of 2022 ====================================================== Anuradha Devi wife of Bhola Prasad Yadav @ Bhola Yadav, Resident of Village- Nirpur, Police Station, Sheikhpura, District- Sheikhpura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Superintendent of Police, Sheikhpura, DistrictSheikhpura. 2.

The Punjab National Bank through Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, Sheikhpura, District- Sheikhpura.

3.

The United India Insurance Company Limited, Town Hall, Vijay Bazar, Nawada, District- Nawada.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Prabhat Kumar Verma ( AAG 3 ) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Ghosarvey, AC to AAG 3 For the Bank Mr. Suresh Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon'ble the Chief Justice/Hon'ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential offices/residences. Also the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/offices.) 14-10-2022 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- "That this writ application is being filed for quashing the letter dated 15.06.2022 passed by Branch Manger, Punjab National Bank, Sheikhpura by which the amount

Patna High Court CWJC No.13176 of 2022(2) dt.14-10-2022 2/3 deducted from the petitioner's account in arbitrary manner and refused to return to the petitioner and further direction may kindly be given to the respondents to return the excess amount of the petitioner and to issue appropriate writ/ writs, direction/ directions, order/orders as your Lordships may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case."

After the matter was heard for some time, finding the Court not in favour of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, states that the petitioner shall be content if the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum and to take recourse to such other alternate remedies which are equally efficacious in law.

Prayer allowed.

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

Liberty reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such other remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law.

It stands clarified that all issues of fact and law are left open to be agitated by the competent authority.

Patna High Court CWJC No.13176 of 2022(2) dt.14-10-2022 3/3 Interlocutory application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) K.C.Jha/-DKS U