Santosh Kumar Saw @ Santosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54518 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-2024 Thana- MUFFASIL District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Santosh Kumar Saw @ Santosh Kumar SON OF MOHAN SAW Resident of Village- Bishnupur PO- Bishnupur Chhati (Patti) PS -Dev (Deo) District -Aurangabad Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Uma Kant Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-07-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Aurangabad (M) P.S. Case No. 113 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

The learned APP submits that the offence for which the instant FIR has been instituted, carries punishment of seven years and less, the said submission of the learned APP is not disputed by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

4.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that investigation in the case against the petitioner is still continuing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54518 of 2024(2) dt.30-07-2024 2/2 and he has not been granted the benefit of Section 41A of the Cr.P.C, on which the learned APP thus submits that the case be disposed of in terms of the order dated 13-2-2024 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar).

5.

In view of the submission made by the learned APP, the anticipatory bail application is disposed of in terms of the order dated 13-2-2024 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar). 6.

The petitioner would be at liberty to file a representation before the concerned Superintendent of Police and the Investigating Officer of the case, within a period of three weeks from today, with a web copy of the order dated 132-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the state of Bihar); and the concerned Superintendent of Police shall ensure that the Investigating Officer of the case strictly adheres to the directions contained in the order dated 132-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar).

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T