← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48925/2014bail granted

Wakil Yadav @ Wakil Pd. Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2015-03-13Mr. Justice Birendra Prasad Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48925 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -76 Year- 2013 Thana -SABAUR District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Wakil Yadav @ Wakil Pd. Yadav son of late Chamru Yadav Resident of Village - Mirzapur, Police Station - Sabour, District - Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Syed Masleh-Uddin Ashraf For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-03-2015 Heard.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a criminal prosecution registered under Sections 143, 149 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code.

Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner, besides others, is alleged to have committed ruckus while he was on strike along with others and further taking into consideration the fact that allegations against him are not very serious, this Court is inclined to accede to the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. In the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, , Bhagalpur in connection with Sabour P.S. Case No. 76 of 2013, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. and subject to further conditions that:

(A) One of the bailors must be government servant or close family member of the petitioner, who will file

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48925 of 2014 (2) dt.13-03-2015 2/2 an affidavit in the court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioner, (B) if the petitioner is found involved in same and similar nature of cases in future, then in that case the informant/ prosecution shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner, and if such a petition is filed, then the court below would be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned and (C) the petitioner shall make regular pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing himself in person or through representation by his lawyer on each and every dates, and if on two consecutive dates petitioners fails to make pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel his bail bonds.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) BTiwary/- U T