Faiyazuddin Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5163 of 2016 =========================================================== Faiyazuddin Ahmad, son of Late Shamsuddin Ahmad Khan, resident of VillageAgarpur, P.O + P.S.- Lalganj, District- Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Home Commissioner, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5. Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.

6. The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, District- Vaishali.

7. Superintendent of Police, Hajipur, District- Vaishali.

8. Secretary, Minority Commission, Bihar, Patna.

9. Officer-in-charge, Lalganj Police Station, District- Vaishali. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. S. D. Yadav, AAG-IX. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 04-02-2017 The petitioner in the present writ application in public interest has claimed direction to the respondents to rehabilitate the victims of Lalganj's riots falling within the area of Lalganj Police Station on 18.11.2015.

In the counter affidavit dated 18.04.2016, the list of the victims and payments made to them have been appended as Annexure-B whereas Annexure-C is the list of the persons to whom the police protection has been given.

In another counter affidavit dated 03.05.2016 filed on

Patna High Court CWJC No.5163 of 2016 dt.04-02-2017 2/2 behalf of the Superintendent of Police, Vaishali at Hajipur, it has been mentioned that the case in respect of riots have been investigated properly under the supervision of senior police officials and the accused persons against whom the evidence collected were remanded to judicial custody and some other absconding accused persons have been arrested.

In view of the action taken by the respondents, we do not find that any direction is required to be called for in the present public interest litigation.

The present writ application, thus, stands disposed of. (Hemant Gupta, ACJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) Mishra AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 08.02.2017 Transmission Date