Ranjit Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33328 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2017 Thana- HABIBPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Ranjit Paswan, Son of Karu Paswan, Resident of Village- Daudwat (Sardarpur), P.S.- Habibpur, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Subhash Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 18-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Habibpur P.S. case no. 3 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 406, 467, 471, 420, 379, 427, 120B, 386 and 327 of the Indian Penal Code Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is neither the seller of the land nor the purchaser. He has been dragged in this case due to land dispute between the seller and the purchaser and on account of this petitioner being present when the demarcation between the seller and the purchaser was completed. In the written report there is general and omnibus allegation against this petitioner.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33328 of 2018(2) dt.18-06-2018 2/2 petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Habibpur P.S. case no. 3 of 2017, G.R.No. 195 of 2017 he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM 12th Bhagalpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions:(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T