Dr. Bhuvnesh Mishra v. Rabindra Kumar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL REVIEW No.198 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.166 of 2016 ====================================================== Dr. Bhuvnesh Mishra The Block Development Officer-cum-Election Officer, Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Rabindra Kumar and Ors Son of Ram Chandra Singh Resident of VillageKorbaddha, P.O. Laguniya, Suryakanth, Police Station- SamastipurMuffasil, District- Samastipur.

2.

The State of Bihar through Secretary Co-Operative Department, Bihar,Patna. 3.

The Bihar State Election Authority, Patna through Chief Election Officer. 4.

The District Magistrate-cum-District Election Officer, Samastipur. 5.

The Registrar, Co-operative Societies Bihar, Patna. 6.

The Joint Registrar Co-operative Societies, Darbhanga Pramandal, Darbhanga.

7.

The Additional Collector-cum-Nodel Officer PACS, Samastipur. 8.

Korbaddha PACS Ltd. Korbaddha through its Manager Arbind Kumar Son of Ram Chandra Singh 9.

Shiv Shambhu Kumar Son of Sita Ram Mahto Chairman of Korbaddha PACS.

10.

Ram Swarath Mahto Son of Kantu Mahto 11.

Jangi Paswan Son of Bachchan Paswan 12.

Deo Chandra Jha Son of Suryadeo Jha 13.

Manju Kumari Wife of Arbind Kumar 14.

Pama Nand Rai Son of Satyanarayan Rai 15.

Ramashish Mahto Son of Chhotan Mahto 16.

Saroj Devi Wife of Satya Narayan Mahto 17.

Sunita Devi Wife of Jitendra Kumar Bablu 18.

Ram Koshi Devi Wife of Chandeshwar Ram 19.

Pawan Devi Wife of Narendra Kumar Sr. No. 9 to 19 all resident of VillageKorbaddha, P.O. Laguniya Surya Kanth, Police Station- SamastipurMufasil District- Samastipur.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar, AC to Ex-AAG- 11 ======================================================

Patna High Court C. REV. No.198 of 2017(3) dt.30-01-2025 2/2 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 30-01-2025 None appeared on behalf of the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the State submits that through the connected writ petition, the election of Co-operative Societies, 2014 has been challenged. Learned counsel has further submitted that the next election has been conducted. As such, the present review petition has become infructuous.

3. Accordingly, the present Review Petition stands dismissed as being infructuous.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) A.K.V.//- U