Mukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6974 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-351 Year-2020 Thana- HARNAUT District- Nalanda ====================================================== MUKESH KUMAR Son of Arjun Yadav Resident of Village - Ganjpar, P.s.- Harnaut (Gokhulpur), Dist.- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar No.1, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted through Video Conferencing and the Advocates joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residence.) 17-04-2021 The defect (s) as pointed out by the Office be removed by the learned counsel for the petitioner within two months after High Court resumes its normal functioning. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-6)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

Allegation is recovery of one loaded pistol and one live cartridge from the possession of the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner is in custody since 26.07.2020.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6974 of 2021(2) dt.17-04-2021 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail, after completing one year in judicial custody, upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Harnaut (Gokhulpur) P.S. Case No. 351/2020 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T