Meena Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38372 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -3 Year- 2018 Thana -KUMARGHAND District- MADHEPURA ====================================================== Meena Devi .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Vishoka Nand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ramchandra Sahani, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and leaned Additional Public Prosecutor of the State.

The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in connection with Kumarkhand P.S. Case No. 03 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302, 341, 324, 504 and 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the other co-accused persons including petitioner is of assault to the wife with dhabiya and danda and when daughter of the informant came to save her mother, was also assaulted, causing death of the wife of the informant.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner rather allegation against all the accused persons. It is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38372 of 2018 (2) dt.29-06-2018 2/2 also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer of bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Kumarkhand P.S. Case No. 03 of 2018 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Madhepura, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. with other that bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned and petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and shall be present before the police as and when required, otherwise prosecution is at liberty to move for cancellation of her bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T