Gajendra Rai v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3923 of 2011 ====================================================== Gajendra Rai, son of Late Matuk Rai, Resident of village - Gahra Bahram, P.S. Paroo, District- Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Sri Arun Kumar Kuer, son of not known to the petitioner, the then District Superintendent of Education, Muzaffarpur, District Muzaffarpur

3. Sri Abdus Salam Ansari, son of not known to the petitioner presently posted as the District Program officer (Establishment), Muzaffarpur, District Muzaffarpur

4. Sri upendra Singh, son of not known to the petitioner presently posted as the treasury Officer, Muzaffarpur, District Muzaffarpur

5. Sri I.D.S. Dhariwal, son of not known to the petitioner, presently posted as the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna .... .... Contemnors-Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh For the Contemnors-Opposite Parties :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 15-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AC to SC No. 27 as well as Sri J.P. Karn, learned senior counsel, who has appeared on behalf of Accountant General, Bihar. The present petition was filed with a prayer to initiate contempt proceeding against opposite parties on an allegation of willful disobedience to an order dated 6/9/2010 passed in CWJC No. 14716 of 2010. By the said order the writ petition was disposed of on the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner for filing representation for expeditious disposal of the claims in compliance with the order of the writ court. Learned State Counsel submits that the District

Patna High Court MJC No.3923 of 2011 (6) dt.15-01-2015 2/2 Programme Officer had examined the claims and passed a reasoned order on 5/1/2012 which has been brought on record as Annexure - 'A' to the show cause of opposite party no. 3. Keeping in view the fact that a reasoned order has already been passed, the court is of the opinion that no contempt can be initiated.

The petition stands disposed of.

If the petitioner feels aggrieved with the order of the District Programme Officer, he would be at liberty to avail appropriate remedy.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U