Vikky Sharma @ Viccy Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.36590 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2018 Thana- SAMASTIPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Vikky Sharma @ Viccy Sharma son of Dilip Prasad Sharma, resident of Village- Bichha Gaon, in front of Shiv Mandir, Munger, P.S. and DistrictMunger. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shivendra Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Parmanand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 28-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Samastipur Town P.S. Case No. 92 of 2018 registered for offences under sections 406, 408 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

An allegation has been made that the petitioner was made Director of the Institute and has misappropriated the money.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he was merely a Teacher and he has joined the Institute at a later stage, he had made a request for enhancement of salary, on refusal, he left the Institute, whereafter, the case has been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36590 of 2018(2) dt.28-06-2018 2/2 framed against him by the Chairman of the Sandhya Science Classes Coaching Center, Samastipur.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely, Vikky Sharma @ Viccy Sharma, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Samastipur (Town) P.S. Case No. 92 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled. (Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T