← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53357/2024allowed

Sahil Paswan @ Sahil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-28Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53357 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-188 Year-2024 Thana- PARSABAZAR District- Patna ====================================================== Sahil Paswan @ Sahil Kumar Son of Sanjay Paswan @ Sanjay Kumar R/O Mohalla- Kurthol, West of Chura Mill, P.s.- Parsa Bazar, Dist.- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Deovind Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Shaheen Begum, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegedly, the petitioner is said to have kidnapped the daughter of the informant on point of arms.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged has ever taken place. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is totally false and based on concocted facts. It is further submitted that the statement of the victim has been recorded under Section

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53357 of 2024(2) dt.28-08-2024 2/2 161 Cr.P.C. as well as Section 164 Cr.P.C., in which she has not supported the prosecution case. Learned counsel further submits that later on, the informant, in her statement before the police, has stated that merely on the ground of suspicion, she levelled allegation against the petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as the name of the petitioner has been transpired in the present case merely on suspicion, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Parsa Bazar P.S. Case No. 188 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T