Ritesh Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31390 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -60 Year- 2018 Thana -ARWAL District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Ritesh Ranjan S/o Laldeo Prasad @ Laldew Prasad, R/o Vill.- Harpura, P.S.- Jehanabad (Karauna O.P.), District- Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Arwal P.S. Case No.60 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the F.I.R., this petitioner was apprehended by police with a stolen motorcycle.

It has been submitted that the said motorcycle was purchased from one Dhiraj Paswan who had assured him to make papers available at the time of payment of full consideration. The petitioner is in custody since 24.02.2018 having clean antecedent and so he deserves bail.

The learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31390 of 2018 (3) dt.09-07-2018 submission.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of bail is allowed. The petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Arwal in connection with Arwal P.S. Case No.60 of 2018, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) If the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of allegation, the prosecution will have liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail. (Sanjay Kumar, J) Harish/- U