Alaudin @ Alauddin Seikh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54217 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-238 Year-2024 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Alaudin @ Alauddin Seikh Son of Jamaluddin R/O- Khairwa, P.S.- Dhaka, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar, Advocate Mr. Shamir Mehra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Abhay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 18-08-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case no.238 of 2024, registered under sections 307, 341, 324, 354, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, over a dispute between the parties who are neighbours, it is stated that the accused persons including the petitioner herein assaulted the informant and others. The petitioner is said to have assaulted with a dabiya on the head of the informant causing grievous injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The parties are neighbours. The main allegation is on co-accused Jamaluddin who is said to have given blow with a sword on the head of the informant. So far as the petitioner is concerned, there is no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54217 of 2025(2) dt.18-08-2025 2/2 repetition of blow. The petitioner, who is a 25 year old young person, has no criminal antecedent. He undertakes to cooperate in the investigation/trial.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner of having given a blow with dabiya on the head of the informant together with the contents of the injury report discussed in the order of the learned trial Court, according to which corresponding injury has been found on the skull region which in the opinion of the doctor is grievous in nature, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail and the application is rejected.

7. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the learned Court below within a period of four weeks.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/- U T