Sahid Alam @ Shalil Alam @ Sahil Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51068 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-340 Year-2024 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Sahid Alam @ Shalil Alam @ Sahil Alam S/o Akabar Ali @ Akbar R/o Village- Badkudawa, P.S.- Paharpur, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 10-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and perused the case diary.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 340 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 311 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner along with other co-accused persons entered into the house of the informant with an intention of committing robbery and brutally attacked her father, mother and brother by means of knives.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51068 of 2025(4) dt.10-11-2025 2/2 also submits that no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner rather the same is general and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that the petitioner was a passerby of that way and was arrested on the basis of suspicion. It is further submitted that the injuries received by the injured are simple in nature. The petitioner is in custody since 31.07.2024 and has got no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 340 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T