← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8477/2016withdrawn

Om Prakash v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-09-20Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8477 of 2016 ====================================================== Om Prakash, Son of Late Shyam Sundar Singh, resident of villagePuranhiya Nagadaha, P.S.- Ghorasahan in the district of East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna

4. The Additional Director General (Vigilance), Government of Bihar, Patna

5. The Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna

6. The Joint Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

7. The Deputy Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna

8. The District Magistrate, Patna

9. The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur

10. The District Magistrate, Siwan

11. The District Magistrate, Saran

12. The District Magistrate, Jamui

13. The District Magistrate, Darbhanga

14. The District Magistrate, Munger

15. The District Magistrate, East Champaran

16. The District Magistrate, West Champaran

17. The District Magistrate, Samastipur

18. The District Magistrate, Jehanabad

19. The District Magistrate, Vaishali

20. The District Magistrate, Sasaram .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Amarendra Kumar, A.C. to AAG-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 20-09-2016 Heard Mr. Sunil Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Amarendra Kumar, learned Assistant Counsel to AAG-15, appearing for the respondents.

Patna High Court CWJC No.8477 of 2016 (2) dt.20-09-2016 2/2 Mr. Sunil Kumar, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

(I.A. Ansari,CJ) (Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U