Patna High CourtMJC/3060/2013dismissed

Radha Krishna Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-05-18Mr. Justice Ramesh Kumar Datta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3060 of 2013 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 22029 of 2012 ====================================================== Radha Krishna Prasad S/o Late Vishun Prasad, Resident of Village and P.O.- Kendua, P.S.:- Narhat, District:- Nawada, presently residing at Mohalla- Ganga Vihar Colony, P.S.- Beur, Town and District- Patna .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Secretary, Water Resources Department, New Secretariat, Baily Road, Patna namely, Sri Arun Kumar Singh, S/o not known to the petitioner

2. The Commissioner, Water Resources Department, New Secretariat, Baily Road, Patna, namely, Sri Arun Kumar Singh, S/o not known to the petitioner

3. The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, New Secretariat, Baily Road, Patna, namely, Sri Bishwanath Chaudhary, S/o not known to the petitioner

4. The Superintending Engineer, Water Resources Department, Mithapur, Bihar, Patna, namely, Sri Akhilesh Sharma, S/o not known to the petitioner

5. The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Digha, Karbigahia, Bihar, Patna, namely, Sri Shivendra Sharma, S/o not known to the petitioner .... .... Opp. Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the State : Mr. S.K.Sharma, G.A. 1 Mr. Himansu Kumar, AC to G.A.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA ORAL ORDER 18-05-2016 No one appears for the petitioner.

As directed, the opposite party No.5, the Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Digha, Karbigahia is personally present in Court. A supplementary show cause has also been filed on his behalf in which it is stated that the order under contempt has been complied with by calculating the leave

Patna High Court MJC No.3060 of 2013 (3) dt.18-05-2016 encashment amount due to the petitioner and the same was paid to the petitioner by cheque dated 15.6.2015, with respect to which photo copy of acquittance roll has also been brought on the record. In the above circumstances, the contempt application is dismissed.

The personal appearance of the Executive Engineer is dispensed with.

(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) spal/- U