Mahesh Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50971 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2021 Thana- RAHIKA District- Madhubani ====================================================== MAHESH CHOUDHARY S/O SHANKAR CHAUDHARY Resident of village- Jagatpur, P.S.- Rahika District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravi Prakash : Mr. Gagandev Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-12-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 341, 323, 442, 307, 379 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case, when the informant's son Arjun Chaudhary was at the house, the accused persons including the petitioner came and forcibly brought her son and threw him from the bridge and took his mobile and a gold chain. The injured then was referred to PMCH for treatment but he

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50971 of 2022(2) dt.14-12-2022 2/2 was further treated at the private hospital in Darbhanga. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that as per the injury report injured Arjun Kumar sustained abrasion wound on the right forearm which is grievous in nature. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 25.06.2022.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Madhubani in connection with Rahika P.S. Case No. 25 of 2021. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Ayush/niku/- U T