Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1422/2015bail granted

Smt. Rukhsana Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

2015-05-26Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1422 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -189 Year- 2014 Thana -SIMRI District- BUXAR ======================================================

1. Smt. Rukhsana Khatoon W/o Jawed Akhtar R/o Vill - Simri, P.S. - Simri, District - Buxar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shree Kant Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh 1 (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 26-05-2015 Heard the parties. The Mukhiya of the relevant time has filed the present application seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Simri P.S. Case No. 189 of 2014 instituted under diverse provisions of the Penal Code including Section 420 IPC.

The allegation is that in purchase of solar light, financial irregularity was committed. Contention of the petitioner is that other accused persons having identical allegation have since been released on bail. Diverse orders have been enclosed. The agency BREDA was the agency nominated by the Government subsequent to the purchase.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender in the Court below within four

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1422 of 2015 (5) dt.26-05-2015 2/2 weeks, the petitioner abovenamed is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in Simri P.S. Case No. 189 of 2014 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with the further following conditions:

(i) One of the bailers shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.

(ii) In case of framing of charge, the petitioner shall appear in person on each and every date fixed in the Court below. In case of default on two consecutive occasions without any cogent/satisfactory reason, the Trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner secure her arrest in accordance with law.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Pankaj/- U T