Sanjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8081 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-385 Year-2020 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.

SANJAY KUMAR Son of Nand Prasad Resident of Village- Bandhuganj Math, P.S.- Ghoshi, Distt- Jehanabad 2.

Sanju Devi W/o Nand Prasad Resident of Village- Bandhuganj Math, P.S.- Ghoshi, Distt- Jehanabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Mohan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Ghoshi P.S. Case No. 385 of 2020 registered for the offence under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the allegation, the daughter of the informant was killed by her in-laws and husband.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the husband had informed the informant about the death of the deceased and there is no specific allegation on them, therefore they deserve anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners that the father of the deceased was informed after the cremation of the victim and this act on behalf of the accused persons creates doubt about the version of the petitioners that the deceased had committed suicide.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8081 of 2021(2) dt.06-12-2021 2/2 Considering the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioners, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. In case the petitioners surrenders and prays for regular bail before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, the court below will consider the petition for regular bail of the petitioners without being prejudice by the fact that anticipatory bail petition has been rejected by this Court. The court below will also consider the fact that the husband of the deceased has already been granted regular bail. (Sandeep Kumar, J) pravinkumar/- U