Punit Sadai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49634 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2025 Thana- KHUTAUNA District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.
Punit Sadai S/o Umed Sadai R/o Village - Ekharai Brindavan, Ward No .3, P.S.- Ladaniya, District- Nadhubani 2.
Vijay Sadai S/o Kaleshwar Sadai @ Kameshwar Sadai R/o Village - Ekharai Brindavan, Ward No .3, P.S.- Ladaniya, District- Nadhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ravi Prakash For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Khutauna P.S. Case No. 69 of 2025 dated 18.05.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 274, 275 read with section 3(5) of the BNS and section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, total 225 litres of illicit Nepali liquor was recovered from the Tempo.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioners are not the owner of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49634 of 2025(2) dt.28-07-2025 2/2 said vehicle. The petitioners have no concern with the alleged recovery. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioners have clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 19.05.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Khutauna P.S. Case No. 69 of 2025.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T