Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33600 of 2018 (2) dt.07-06-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.33600 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -39 Year- 2018 Thana -KORANSARAI District- BUXAR ======================================================
1. Vikash Kumar S/o Saral Mahto @ Jag-Mohan Singh @ Jagmohan Koiri, R/o Vill.- Nandan, P.S.- Dumraon, District- Buxar. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Uday Chand Prasad, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 07-06-2018 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Koransaria Police Station Case No. 39 of 2018, disclosing offences under Sections 30(a) Bihar Prohibition Act, 2016. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner, who is of clean antecedent, is innocent and has not committed any offence. In fact, the alleged recovery of English Wine was made from one Tuntun Choudhary, which is evident from seizure list and the petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner deserves the privilege of anticipatory bail.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33600 of 2018 (2) dt.07-06-2018 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J.-II -cum- Special Judge Excise Act, Buxar, in connection with Koransarai Police Station Case No. 39 of 2018, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U T