Lalan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6941 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-339 Year-2020 Thana- DEEPNAGAR District- Nalanda ====================================================== LALAN KUMAR Son of Pramod Ram Resident of Village - Sipah, P.S.- Deep Nagar, District - Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rabindra Prasad Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted through Video Conferencing and the Advocates joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residence.) 16-04-2021 The defect(s) as pointed out by the Office be removed by the learned counsel for the petitioner within two months after the High Court resumes its normal functioning. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Amendment Act, 2018.
Allegation is recovery of 386 litres foreign liquor from a Pickup Van.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner nor petitioner has any concern with the seized
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6941 of 2021(2) dt.16-04-2021 2/2 liquor. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 07.10.2020.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending, in connection with Deep Nagar P.S. Case No. 339 of 2020, with following conditions:-
(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.
(S. Kumar, J) shahzad/- U T