Patna High CourtCWJC/3948/2016disposed

Arun Kumar Sinha v. Magadh University And ORS

2018-03-26Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3948 of 2016 ====================================================== Arun Kumar Sinha, Son of Late Bharat Prasad, Resident of Keshri Nagar, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Magadh University through its Registrar, Bodh Gaya, Gaya.

2. Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya.

3. Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya.

4. Principal, A.N. College, Boring Road, Patna.

5. State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Patna Secretariat, Patna.

6. Principal Secretary, Education Department, Patna Secretariat, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Soni Srivastava, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Rakesh Saran Singh- Gp29 For MU Priyank Deepak, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 26-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, University as well as the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue raised in the present writ application is no more res integra. A bench of this court vide judgment dated 20.5.2016 in C.W.J.C. No. 3685 of 2016 has already decided the issue and as such this writ application may be disposed of in similar terms of C.W.J.C. 3685 of 2016 vide judgment dated 20.5.2016. Considering the fact that C.W.J.C. No. 36185 of 2016 was decided by a coordinate bench of this court there is no justification to take a different view in the present writ

Patna High Court CWJC No.3948 of 2016(2) dt.26-03-2018 2/2 application.

Accordingly, this writ application is being disposed of with a direction to the Registrar of the University to consider the claim of the petitioner raised in this writ petition and take a decision in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. If the petitioner's claim finds favour of the Registrar then necessary payment should be made within a period of one month thereafter. If the petitioner's claim is not found tenable then a reasoned order would be required to be passed and communicated to the petitioner within the aforesaid period of two months.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U