Mohamad Zeeshan @ Zeeshan @ Md. Zeeshan @ Mohd. Zeeshan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52397 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2025 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia ====================================================== Mohamad Zeeshan @ Zeeshan @ Md. Zeeshan @ Mohd. Zeeshan Son of Mohd. Mohsin @ Md. Mohsin @ Md. Mohsim Resident of House no. 12 Amna PS -Dagarua District -Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Md Fazle Karim, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with K. Hat P.S. Case No. 90 of 2025 registered for the offences under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 132, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant posted as Vehicle Inspector, Purnea, alleged that during a driving test, the petitioner entered the room of the informant and started pressurizing him to declare him successful in the qualifying test. When the informant expressed his inability, he was threatened and abused, and unparliamentary language was also used by him.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52397 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the instant case. Further submission is that the petitioner has only raised his voice against the non issuance of driving license as of bribe was being demanded by the officials of the transport department. It is next submitted that petitioner is a student of Patliputra University and has very bright future ahead. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with K. Hat P.S. Case No. 90 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with corresponding Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S. as well as subject to the following conditions:-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52397 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 3/3 (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his close relative.
(ii) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each date of the trial.
(iii) In case of absence on two consecutive dates, or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned. (iv) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence in future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bond.
(v) The learned Court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
7. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is allowed. (Sourendra Pandey, J) tusharika/- U T