← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55932/2023allowed

Sunil Ram @ Sunil Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2023-09-15Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55932 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-808 Year-2022 Thana- ARA NAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.

SUNIL RAM @ SUNIL PASWAN SON OF LATE PARMAL RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MIRACHAK PS- ARA NAGAR, DISTTBHOJPUR 2.

RAVI PASWAN @ KUMAR RAVI KISHORE SON OF LATE PARMAL PASWAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MIRACHAK PS- ARA NAGAR, DISTT- BHOJPUR 3.

GOVINDA KUMAR SON OF SUNIL PASWAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MIRACHAK PS- ARA NAGAR, DISTT- BHOJPUR 4.

GULSHAN KUMAR SON OF SUNIL PASWAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MIRACHAK PS- ARA NAGAR, DISTT- BHOJPUR 5.

GAUTAM KUMAR SON OF SUNIL PASWAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MIRACHAK PS- ARA NAGAR, DISTT- BHOJPUR 6.

BAIKUNTH RAM SON OF LATE FIRANGI RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MOKHLISA, PS- KOILWAR, DISTT- BHOJPUR 7.

RAUSHAN RAM @ ROSHAN KUMAR SON OF BAIKUNTH RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MOKHLISA, PS- KOILWAR, DISTTBHOJPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abdul M. Khan, Adv.

Mr.Binay Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 15-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 304(B) and 201 IPC.

3. Allegedly, the daughter of the informant is said to have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55932 of 2023(3) dt.15-09-2023 2/3 been killed by the accused petitioners due to non-fulfillment of the demands of the accused.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. It is fairly submitted that the petitioners are the agnates of the husband of the deceased and they have no knowledge about the husband of the deceased as he solemnized love marriage with the deceased and thereafter, never returned back home. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since the petitioners are the agnates of the husband of the deceased and there is no specific overt act against them, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55932 of 2023(3) dt.15-09-2023 3/3 below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Ara Nagar P.S. Case No.808 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T