← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/11788/2025disposed

M/S Rsm Infra Projects v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-31Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy,The Chief Justice-2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11788 of 2025 ====================================================== M/S RSM Infra Projects Head Office at Holding No. 39/328, B-28, P-12 Opp. Sona Motors, 3rd Mile, Sevoke Road, P.O. Salugarha-734008, Bhaktinagar, Dist.-Jalapaiguri, West Bengal (India) through its Power of Attorney Holder Namely Vinay Kumar Singh, Male, aged about 53 Years, Son of Late Ramnath Singh, AMBIOK, Pankhasari, Khasmahal, Darjeeling, West Bengal735231. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Engineer-in-Chief-Cum-Special Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Chief Engineer, Rural Works Division, Patna. 5.

The Superintending Engineer, Works Circle, Saran at Chapra. 6.

The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Work Division, Marhaura, Saran at Chapra.

7.

Shri Shams Tabrej Son of not Known to the Petitioner, Presently Posted as Executive Engineer, Rural Works Division, Marhaura, Chapra. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate Ms. Aradhana Kumari, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ajay, GA-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 31-07-2025 Ms. Aradhana Kumari, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instruction, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.

2. Permission, as prayed for, is granted.

3. The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.

Patna High Court CWJC No.11788 of 2025(3) dt.31-07-2025 2/2

4. It is clarified that we have not examined the merits of the case of the petitioner.

(Vipul M. Pancholi, CJ) (Partha Sarthy, J) avinash/Saurabh U