Ashok Tanti v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50429 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2026 Thana- MATIHANI District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.

Ashok Tanti So Gango Tanti Ro Village - Pannapur, P.S. - Mathani, Dist. - Begusarai.

2.

Mithlesh Kumar @ Mithlesh Tanti S/o Ashok Tanti Ro Village - Pannapur, P.S. - Mathani, Dist. - Begusarai.

3.

Bittu Tanti @ Bittu Kumar S/o Sanjay Tanti Ro Village - Pannapur, P.S. - Mathani, Dist. - Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Nirmala Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Mathani P.S. Case No. 100 of 2026, instituted for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. Prosecution story, in short, is that on 10.05.2026 at about 11:30 P.M., the informant was allegedly assaulted by the accused persons at village Pannapur with fists, kicks and weapons, causing head injuries and the loss of four teeth.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50429 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that general and omnibus allegation has been made against these petitioners. No specific overt act is alleged against these petitioners. Police, after completion of the investigation, submitted charge-sheet against the petitioners. He further submitted that as per injury report, the injury is found to be grievous in nature. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners are in custody since 15.05.2026 and have no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Mathani P.S. Case No. 100 of 2026.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T