Aman Raj @ Bitu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.2205 of 2018 ====================================================== Aman Raj @ Bitu Singh sonof Baidya Nath singh @ Baidya Nath @ shiv Nath Prasad Singh @ Baidya Nath Pd. Singh resident of village Hanuman Nagar, P.S. Khutauna, District Madhubani .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr.

For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-06-2018 Heard the parties.

Earlier the prayer for bail of the appellant was rejected by this Court, vide order dated 6.11.2017 passed in Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No.2393 of 2017.

Submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is that in spite of direction of the Court, up till now the trial has not been concluded and out of 10 witnesses only 5 witnesses have been examined.

Heard learned Spl.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the appellant, however, the learned Special Judge is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude the trial within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the order.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2205 of 2018 (2) dt.27-06-2018 2/2 At the same time, the S.P., Madhubani is directed to ensure presence of the witnesses.

With the aforesaid observation, this appeal is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T