Shahadat Ansari @ Md Sahadat Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7091 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-109 Year-2020 Thana- CHANDRADIP District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.

SHAHADAT ANSARI @ MD SAHADAT HUSSAIN Son of Baudhu Ansari @ Abdul Shakoor Resdient of Village- Aliganj, P.S.- Chandradeep, Distt- Jamui.

2.

Nayeem Ansari @ Md. Naimuddin Son of budhu Ansari @ Abdul Shakoor Resident of Village- Bishunpur, Piprahi, P.S.- Amnaur, Distt- Saran at Chapra.

3.

Naseem Ansari Son of Baudhu Ansari @ Abdul Shakoor Resident of Village- Bishunpur, Piprahi, P.S.- Amnaur, Distt- Saran at Chapra. 4.

Maqsood Ansari Son of Baudhu Ansari @ Abdul Shakoor Resident of Village- Bishunpur, Piprahi, P.S.- Amnaur, Distt- Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-12-2021 Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned APP for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Chandradeep P.S. Case No. 109 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 323, 307, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7091 of 2021(3) dt.16-12-2021 2/2 As per allegation, accused persons badly assaulted the informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the the allegation against the petitioners are general and omnibus in nature and there is also a counter case. He has further submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

Impugned order of the Sessions Judge, Jamui, dated 12.10.2020 shows that the injury report of injured Md. Najam is on parietal scalp and nature of injury is grievous. As such, it is not a fit case for anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected.

Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey , J) SONALI/- U T