Ashish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63003 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-300 Year-2021 Thana- ARA NAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Ashish Kumar Son of Om Prakash Singh Resident of - Badi Mathia, Police Station - Ara Town, District - Bhojpur at Ara. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Syed Ehteshamuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner, husband of informant/complainant apprehends his arrest in Ara (Town) P.S. Case No. 300 of 2021 registered for the offence under Section 498(A) and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) per month, starting from this month to informant/complainant.

In view of the undertaking of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) per month, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the petitioner above-named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63003 of 2021(2) dt.30-06-2022 2/2 bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Ara P.S. Case No. 300 of 2021 on the following conditions:

(1.) Informant/complainant would file an affidavit before the court below and bring on record her saving bank account number for its communication to the petitioner.

(2.) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid maintenance amount per month in the saving bank account of the informant/complainant.

(3.) In case, the petitioner fails to deposit the maintenance amount for two consecutive months, the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail bond.

(4.) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(5.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(6.) The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings. The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T