Nira Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12972 of 2023 ====================================================== Nira Devi Daughter of Kanhaiya Lal Singh, Wife of Dev Mohan Singh, Resident of Nrityashala, Ward no. 09, Block - Tedhagachh, District - Kishanganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Social and Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Principal Secretary, Social and Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

District Magistrate, Kishanganj.

4.

District Programme Officer, ICDS, Kishanganj. 5.

Child Development Programme Officer (CDPO) Tedhagachh, Kishanganj. 6.

Sulekha Devi, Daughter of Bachan Lal Singh, Wife of Devanand Singh, Resident of Nrityashala, Block - Tedhagachh, District - Kishanganj. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.S.K. Mandal (Sc3) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 12-02-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That present application is directed against order dated 13/05/23 passed in Anganwadi appeal case no. 122/2019 whereby and whereunder learned District Magistrate cum Collector, Kishanganj has erroneously rejected the appeal without considering the material fact available on the record and upheld the order dated. 18-09-19 passed by District Programme Officer, ICDS, Kishanganj in Anganwadi case no. 43/2018-19 Whereby and whereunder

Patna High Court CWJC No.12972 of 2023(2) dt.12-02-2024 2/2 District Programme Officer, ICDS, Kishanganj has rejected the petition filed by petitioner against Private respondent No.6, namely, Sulekha Devi who have been selected on the post of Anganwadi Sevika by producing the documents which was obtained by making fraud."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law including that of filing a suit before the learned Civil Court having competent jurisdiction. Liberty, so sought, is granted. 3.

The writ petition stands disposed off as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U