Sheo Pujan Mahto And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.1124 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -57 Year- 2014 Thana -TARAIYA District- SARAN ======================================================
1. Sheo Pujan Mahto Son of Late Ram Deo Mahto
2. Pramod Mahto Son of Sheo Pujan Mahto
3. Lakhan Mahto S/O Sheo Pujan Mahto
4. Sheo Patia Devi Wife of Sheo Pujan Mahto, All R/o Vill.- Rampur,Rudra,P.S-Panapur,Distt.-Saran at Chapra .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nawal Kishore Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 19-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 366, 368, 120B and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
Considering the statement of the alleged victim recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C, let the petitioners above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order in connection with Taraya P.S. case No.57 of 2014 arising out of Complaint case No.3102 of 2013 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1124 of 2015 (2) dt.19-01-2015 2/2 satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Saran at Chapra, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners, (ii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iii) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.
(Anjana Prakash, J) Narendra/- U T