Banke Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7071 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2019 Thana- LAXMIPUR District- Jamui ====================================================== Banke Yadav, son of Gohi Yadav, Resident of Village- Snsarpur, P.S. Gidhaur, District- Jamui ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh, A.P.P.

For the Informant :

Mr. Prabhat Ranjan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 10-02-2021 Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove all the defects as pointed out by office within four weeks after start of normal functioning of the Court. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner in the present case is seeking regular bail in connection with Laxmipur (Gidhaur O.P.) P.S. Case NO. 204 of 2019 registered for the offences under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and subsequently Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was also added. Earlier the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 27.05.2020 passed in Cr. Misc. No.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7071 of 2021(2) dt.10-02-2021 2/2 84454 of 2019.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned A.P.P. for the State and Mr. Prabhat Ranjan, learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the reasons already recorded in the order dated 27.05.2020 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 84454 of 2019, this Court is not persuaded to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage when the trial has already begun and this Court has been informed that the two witnesses have already been examined in course of trial.

This Court would observe that the learned trial court must proceed with the trial without granting unnecessary adjournments, no longer date be fixed and all endevours be made to conclude the trial within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. This application is dismissed.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) vats/- U T Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.